Monday, February 11, 2013

Weekly Message from Steve Warner, Head of School (February 11, 2013)


Greetings, GreenMount Community,

            In 1968, George Land administered a creativity test to 1,600 5-year-olds (Land & Jarman, 1992). The test, which he had developed for NASA to identify innovative scientists and engineers, found that 98 percent of tested children registered at a genius level on the creative scale. But five years later, when Land readministered the test to the then-10-year-old children, only 30 percent of them scored at the genius level of creativity. After another five years, the number dropped to just 12 percent. The same test, administered to 280,000 adults, found that only 2 percent registered at the genius level for creativity. Land concluded that noncreative thinking is learned.
            I recently read this and it got me wondering if, in some way, we diminish creativity in our students as they ascend through the grades.  Do we lessen creative opportunities from kindergarten to grade 8?  My first inclination is to say that at GreenMount we focus on creativity at all levels and that the project-based learning that we incorporate along with our goal to make learning as experiential as possible makes us an exception to this kind of conclusion.  Indeed, I have often said that one of the goals to prepare our students for an uncertain future is to instill a creative nature so that they will be able to deal with all the challenges that this next generation will face.  However, I know that in order to maintain a high creative level in children we must be deliberate in the kind of instructional program we offer and how we provide opportunities for students to be creative and the learn to be creative.
            In the February issue of Educational Leadership, there are several articles on creativity that I will share with the staff in coming weeks.  I have shared with them a rubric for creativity that they can use when assessing the creative aspects of a project.  The rubric assesses creativity from “Very Creative” to “Imitative” and is headed by four basic categories; Variety of ideas and contexts, Variety of sources, Combining ideas, and Communicating something new.  One author suggests that teachers can nurture creativity by minimizing features of the environment that can impede it (social comparisons, contingent rewards, and so on).  Instead, teachers should help students focus on the more intrinsically motivating and meaningful aspects of the work by discussing how students might incorporate their personal interests into the task by acknowledging their creativity (Beghetto, 2013).
I think we do this to a large extent, especially as we allow students to investigate topics that interest them and for which they can use their special talents to express their personal ideas about the topic.  I think you will see many examples of this at our theme event of February 22.  For example, students will be conducting a roundtable discussion about the Bread and Roses strike, which took place during the period of history we are exploring.  The students were given the basic information about this event and then they were on their own to be able to have an informative and intelligent discussion with others who may have opposing views.  They will use traditional research methods to find the information they will need, but they will create how they want to portray the characters they will represent.
            Creativity is a complicated notion.  It is not just thinking “outside the box” and it takes more than just originality.  Creativity requires hard work, effort and risk.  Students need to understand that creativity comes at a cost and that the risks they take may result in rejection, ridicule, or worse (Beghetto, 2013).  This is where the culture of our school plays an important part in minimizing those risks.  At GreenMount, we celebrate risk-taking and students understand when their classmates look at something in an entirely different way.  I think we do a good job with this.
            So what can you do as parents to foster creativity?  Most of you already do it, I know.  Two articles, entitled The Case for Curiosity and The Power of Noticing, say it all.  Even without reading these articles you can see what your job is.  And if you would like to read any of the articles on creativity, let me know and I will make copies for you.

Creativity is just connecting things.  When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, they just saw something.  They were able to connect experiences they’ve had and synthesize new things. – Steve Jobs

Cheers, Steve